![Recommend [izzatruslan]](http://s3.amazonaws.com/arkayne-media/img/badge/logo-recommend-badge-medium.png){kind=icon}
Debat Agenda Daily : “Hari Ini Membentuk Kerajaan, Esok Turun Harga Minyak”
Disclaimer: This is not a kind of political post. It is just an opinion post from me about the issue as an observer. I’m not pro-government or pro-opposition, its an opinion from a normal Malaysian.
Salam and hello all. Have you watch this live debate between Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Datuk Ahmad Shaberi Cheek last Tuesday night? I knew about the debate but don’t have chance to watch it live. But anyway, thanks to Youtube for providing such a great service so I can watch it lastly. You might already read somewhere else, in other blogs, in newspapers, or heard from your friends or others about how this debate goes. Even I didn’t watch it live, but when I asked my friend who watched it, obviously from what they said, I can tell how this debate goes.
One of my friend said, Datuk Ahmad Shabery Cheek looks no idea which most of the time attacked Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim on the personal side and always talked about the past story of Datuk Seri Anwar. Fortunately, Datuk Seri Anwar took all that professionally and explaining what the rakyat need to know, the truth behind these entire fuel price hikes.
When I watch the video of the debate from the Youtube, sometimes it impressed me on how Datuk Seri Anwar answered all the questions given to him. I can see how calm Datuk Seri Anwar answered all the questions and Datuk Ahmad Shabery from the start, always talked about the same point, repeating this and that, and attacked Datuk Seri Anwar personal matters and about his past. Agree with me? I’m not saying that Datuk Ahmad Shabery is not good, but I think he should talked more on facts, not just repeating the same thing.
If you also don’t have chance to watch it live last time, you can download the video here, so you can watch it on your computer or you can watch it on Youtube. For Youtube links, thanks to Knizam, he already gathered it all and just proceed to the link above.
Datuk Seri Anwar talked mostly based on facts and with good informations to be delivered to the rakyat and that’s the good thing that I can see from Datuk Seri Anwar talks. Where for Datuk Ahmad Shabery, as I can see he trying to defend the government about this fuel price hikes.. huhu No wonder la, he’s government people. But, I believe and confident that, the rakyat can think positively and wisely about all these matters from the debate last Tuesday night.
There’s also some questions that asked by the panel to Datuk Shabery Cheek but in my opinion, some of it, he didn’t answered as what the question asked. You can watch the videos and judge it by yourself. Here another more great post regarding this issue from other bloggers and I think its good to share with you. So check them out.
- http://sixtyoldman.com/blog/?p=38 (Debate: No Win No Lose)
- http://sketchut.com/?p=358 (New Straits Times (Wednesday July 16, 2008))
- http://blog.thinker.my/minyak-dari-perspektif-yang-lain/ (Minyak Dari Perspektif Yang Lain)
- Pengalaman sebagai penal dalam debat paling prestij abad ini
So what’s your opinion then? Feel free to drop your comment. 
p/s: who wins? who lose? Quote “If I lose in that debate, I’ll resign as….” 
agree with you. But i feel boring because we still got nothing from that right?
Datuk Seri Dr. Anwar Ibrahim won the debate.
@titan, yup.. nothing change. the reason for this debate is only just to show we’ve freedom of speech in this country.. lols.. but i think its somehow effect the way of rakyat think about the whole story of fuel price hikes.
@Chu King, really? but of course it won’t never declared. if it does, of course someone must go down.. guess who? the one with the quote “if i loss, i’ll resign as…..”
aku rasa isu minyak xrelevan dah.. kenapa xbincang pasal free education.. minyak mahal pon xper asalkan pendidikan diberi secara percuma. Yang tu lebih baik untuk semua kan.. just my 2cent
joes last blog post..Classic Italian riders (Skillful than Mat Rempit lol)
@joe, pada pendapat ak isu minyak still relevan if we want to talk about the economy stability. tgk cam skrang r, taraf inflasi naik mendadak.. kita cb ramalkan apa akan berlaku dalam 6 bulan seterusnya. kalau kekal begini, besar kemungkinan taraf ekonomi akan merudum.
penangan kenaikan minyak ni besar kesannya, sbb itu dijadikan isu debat.
p/s: tp kalo free education tu best la jugak kan, smua peminjam2 ptptn x perlu bayar balik pinjaman. just in dream la..!
haha..paling kesian tgk NC UUM cam kantoi tanya soalan…haha kena bahan balik ngan Anwar..
http://youtube.com/watch?v=z2NOf0EvHV8
amans last blog post..Pemain Video Malaysiakini Berubah Lagi
@aman, part tu ak pun nk gelak..haha..
akoo xgelak pun bila NC UUM cakap camtue. ntah. akoo tgk dari perspektif berbeza. dah nama debat. tentu la ade pro n cons aite? lg pun didikan vc president human caps salah satu syarikat kat mesia nie kat akoo die ckp “kita xleh amek seseorang bekerja dengan keupayaan sama, nnti syarikat mendatar” dan akoo terjemahkan, keupayaan anwar len, shabery len, nc uum tue len. bila jd camnie, ia wujud satu suasana yg bila diterjemahkan, akan terhasil la satu pemikiran yg positif. kalo tanye soalan direct kat dsai, tentu lah makanan die. cuba bg soalan yg diluar pemikiran. tgk respon. adekah bersedia atau tak. tp terpulang la kat korunk nk menilai cane. sekian.
(dr dak umo 18 masih dara :p)
@Extremist Thinker, ya.. len orang len pandangan.. ak setuju apa yg ko ckp, kita xleh ambik pekerja ngan keupayaan yg sama, nnt x berkembang… tp pada ak debat tu akan jadi lebih menarik jika Datuk Ahmad Shabery berbalas info dengan Datuk Seri Anwar, lagi bagus dan lebih banyak input..huhu
x paham ==> (dr dak umo 18 masih dara :p)
hahah. tue pasal. elok berdebat. tp guna fakta betul. sorang fakta ralat, sorang fakta yg tak berapa nk fakta. alih2 rakyat cam akoo kena tipu. hehe… k bro. daaa!
rakyat jadi mangsa~~~! wtfun…